Know the Rules. Trade with Confidence.
Clear, fair rules designed to reward disciplined traders. Select your challenge type below to view the applicable rules.
If a trader came to you asking for capital to trade with a profit share, and showed you 4 trades — one $5,000 win, then losses of $20 and $50, then a $10 win — would you fund them?
Compare that to a trader with 6 trades: wins of $300, $350, $320 and losses of $150, $120, $130. The first trader made more in total ($4,940 vs $570), but the second shows a repeatable edge — wins and losses of similar size, consistently in their favour.
That's what this rule checks for: not how much you made, but whether your edge holds up trade-to-trade rather than depending on one big swing.
A small number of outsized wins can make an account look profitable and consistent when it isn't. Example — a 100K account, Phase 1 target 7% ($7,000):
- +$50
- −$200
- +$20
- +$25
- −$200
- −$100
- +$60
- +$3,000
- −$500
- +$5,000
- +$20
- −$300
- −$200
- +$100
- +$175
- −$200
- +$150
- +$50
- +$100
- Break even
Total: +$7,050 — the 7% target is technically cleared. But trades 8 and 10 alone (highlighted) account for $8,000 of profit. Remove those two outliers and the remaining trades average a $75 win against a $242.85 loss — you'd need to win 4 trades for every 1 loss just to break even. That's not a repeatable edge, so the phase would need to be redone even though the target was hit.
This doesn't mean big wins are penalized or excluded from your final P/L — they still count toward your target. It only affects whether the pass is validated as consistent. If your trades excluding the outlier(s) still show average winners exceeding average losers, you pass cleanly, outlier included.
Important: this check applies to the phase as a whole, not just your most recent trade. If your account was already sitting in profit before one large trade closed out the target, the trades that built that prior profit still need to satisfy 6.1 on their own. An outlier-driven pass earlier in the phase doesn't get "grandfathered in" just because a second outlier follows it — we're checking whether your consistent trades justify the result, not whether any single trade was big enough to make you look consistent in hindsight.
We review every trade taken during the phase, not a cherry-picked window. If the trade count is too low to judge consistency reliably, we may extend the observation period or require additional trading days before making a pass/fail decision.
A handful of trades can't reliably show whether average winners exceed average losers — a couple of trades in either direction can flip the result. More data points give a truer picture of whether your edge is real or coincidental.
If a trader came to you asking for capital to trade with a profit share, and showed you 4 trades — one $5,000 win, then losses of $20 and $50, then a $10 win — would you fund them?
Compare that to a trader with 6 trades: wins of $300, $350, $320 and losses of $150, $120, $130. The first trader made more in total ($4,940 vs $570), but the second shows a repeatable edge — wins and losses of similar size, consistently in their favour.
That's what this rule checks for: not how much you made, but whether your edge holds up trade-to-trade rather than depending on one big swing.
A small number of outsized wins can make an account look profitable and consistent when it isn't. Example — a 100K account, Phase 1 target 7% ($7,000):
- +$50
- −$200
- +$20
- +$25
- −$200
- −$100
- +$60
- +$3,000
- −$500
- +$5,000
- +$20
- −$300
- −$200
- +$100
- +$175
- −$200
- +$150
- +$50
- +$100
- Break even
Total: +$7,050 — the 7% target is technically cleared. But trades 8 and 10 alone (highlighted) account for $8,000 of profit. Remove those two outliers and the remaining trades average a $75 win against a $242.85 loss — you'd need to win 4 trades for every 1 loss just to break even. That's not a repeatable edge, so the phase would need to be redone even though the target was hit.
This doesn't mean big wins are penalized or excluded from your final P/L — they still count toward your target. It only affects whether the pass is validated as consistent. If your trades excluding the outlier(s) still show average winners exceeding average losers, you pass cleanly, outlier included.
Important: this check applies to the phase as a whole, not just your most recent trade. If your account was already sitting in profit before one large trade closed out the target, the trades that built that prior profit still need to satisfy 6.1 on their own. An outlier-driven pass earlier in the phase doesn't get "grandfathered in" just because a second outlier follows it — we're checking whether your consistent trades justify the result, not whether any single trade was big enough to make you look consistent in hindsight.
We review every trade taken during the phase, not a cherry-picked window. If the trade count is too low to judge consistency reliably, we may extend the observation period or require additional trading days before making a pass/fail decision.
A handful of trades can't reliably show whether average winners exceed average losers — a couple of trades in either direction can flip the result. More data points give a truer picture of whether your edge is real or coincidental.
If a trader came to you asking for capital to trade with a profit share, and showed you 4 trades — one $5,000 win, then losses of $20 and $50, then a $10 win — would you fund them?
Compare that to a trader with 6 trades: wins of $300, $350, $320 and losses of $150, $120, $130. The first trader made more in total ($4,940 vs $570), but the second shows a repeatable edge — wins and losses of similar size, consistently in their favour.
That's what this rule checks for: not how much you made, but whether your edge holds up trade-to-trade rather than depending on one big swing.
A small number of outsized wins can make an account look profitable and consistent when it isn't. Example — a 100K account, Phase 1 target 7% ($7,000):
- +$50
- −$200
- +$20
- +$25
- −$200
- −$100
- +$60
- +$3,000
- −$500
- +$5,000
- +$20
- −$300
- −$200
- +$100
- +$175
- −$200
- +$150
- +$50
- +$100
- Break even
Total: +$7,050 — the 7% target is technically cleared. But trades 8 and 10 alone (highlighted) account for $8,000 of profit. Remove those two outliers and the remaining trades average a $75 win against a $242.85 loss — you'd need to win 4 trades for every 1 loss just to break even. That's not a repeatable edge, so the phase would need to be redone even though the target was hit.
This doesn't mean big wins are penalized or excluded from your final P/L — they still count toward your target. It only affects whether the pass is validated as consistent. If your trades excluding the outlier(s) still show average winners exceeding average losers, you pass cleanly, outlier included.
Important: this check applies to the phase as a whole, not just your most recent trade. If your account was already sitting in profit before one large trade closed out the target, the trades that built that prior profit still need to satisfy 6.1 on their own. An outlier-driven pass earlier in the phase doesn't get "grandfathered in" just because a second outlier follows it — we're checking whether your consistent trades justify the result, not whether any single trade was big enough to make you look consistent in hindsight.
We review every trade taken during the phase, not a cherry-picked window. If the trade count is too low to judge consistency reliably, we may extend the observation period or require additional trading days before making a pass/fail decision.
A handful of trades can't reliably show whether average winners exceed average losers — a couple of trades in either direction can flip the result. More data points give a truer picture of whether your edge is real or coincidental.